It appears that Dunc' has taken quite harshly to my roleclaim. Perhaps I misphrased something. I apologise in advance if I did. Allow me to elaborate on my roleclaim.

My roleclaim:

Paraphrasing my role email, my character name's Roy Greenhilt who's one of the vanilla characters. My role is of a semi-bullet proof veteran. Rot also added that a veteran is a one-shot vigilante. I have yet to use my ability.

Elaboration:

1) My character name's Roy Greenhit.

2) My character's one of the ( first few characters created and seen from the beginning of the game. ) The words within the brackets were what I meant as vanilla, that my character's one of the original characters.

3)My role is of a semi-bullet proof veteran. This can be translated to a semi-iron one-shot vigilante.

4) I have not used my ability yet.

Roy is dead at this part of the Saga.
Therefore, you should be a ghost, incapable of contact with the human realm.

I have no knowledge of the theme, but I believe that if my character is dead, then Rot surely must have some conditions in place that relates to this. Of these conditions, however, I have no knowledge.

Not only that, how can you be "Vanilla" AND "Semi-Bulletproof Veteran (One Shot Vig)"
Further evidence you lie.

It seems that you have misinterpreted my roleclaim. Perhaps it was wrong of me to use the word 'vanilla' in the above roleclaim. What I meant was that my character was one of the original characters created. The word 'vanilla' has nothing to do with my role. I apologise for my actions.

ROY IS DEAD.
Therefore there should be conditions preventing his communication with the LIVING.

You seem adamant on the possibility that there are such conditions. I, however, have not been informed about these so-called conditions of yours. If what you say is true, then shouldn't I have been told about these conditions?

a poor RC that contradicts itsself by claiming Vanilla and a Power role.

As I've said earlier, the word, or rather, the adjective 'vanilla' pertains to the character, and not the role. The word 'vanilla' was used to describe that the character was one of the first few characters in the comic, and has no relation whatsoever to the role. I apologise once again if the word caused any confusion.

Isn't he like the main character?

Yes, I think so. Roy appears to be the main character of this theme.

Not buying it...

It appears that Dunc' has taken quite harshly to my roleclaim. Perhaps I misphrased something. I apologise in advance if I did. Allow me to elaborate on my roleclaim.

No, I just don't believe you.
According to OotS canon, Roy is dead, therefore as a character this is not viable as you have stated it.

Yes, I think so. Roy appears to be the main character of this theme.

Roy is among the Main Characters, the story originally revolved around him and his fathers blood oath to kill Xykon, now the plot is more based around his ressurection and Vaarsavius.


I'm still all for lynching you, Wanderer. Canon demands it. I'll be sorry if I'm wrong, but following the trend of this game so far I am forced to believe you to be lying.

If Roy is a major character and nobody's counter-claimed yet, should we believe him?

Definitely not. As DunC said, Roy is dead at this part of the story. Unless he showed up as a ghost I would not expect him in this mafia.

Why would somebody who has not read the comics roleclaim as one of the main character if there mafia? Surely they'd be scared of somebody counterclaiming, if they didn't know Roy to be dead.

I was thinking about that. But ultimately, you're placing "why would they do that" against the fact that the character Wanderer is trying to claim is dead. I think we have to go with canon n this one.

Why would somebody who has not read the comics roleclaim as one of the main character if there mafia? Surely they'd be scared of somebody counterclaiming, if they didn't know Roy to be dead.

You also have to include the fact that mafias work in a group. So although The Wanderer may not have read the comic, his teammates may have told him to rc as Roy since he is dead and no one would counter.

Why would somebody who has not read the comics roleclaim as one of the main character if there mafia? Surely they'd be scared of somebody counterclaiming, if they didn't know Roy to be dead

Because the odds are, they read the comic really or summed up the plot. They hoped most of us wouldn't pick up on the fact Roy is dead, or we would think that there's nought to do with Canon in this Mafia.
Fact remains, chances are too high that he is scum to let him live.

Unless he showed up as a ghost

Which is what I was trying to point out by the fact his role doesn't fit with Canon.
Seeing as He'd be a Post Restricted, Iron, Unlynchable Lover Townie if following Canon.

Post Restricted: Ghost, cannot commune with living other than the oracle
Iron: Ghosts can't die by mortal hands
Unlynchable: Ghosts can't die by mortal Hands
Lover: Spellcasters die. No revive, therefore dead to us all

So, lynch I assume?
'cause we need more votes.

Vote: Wanderer

Bold it

I find The Wanderer's roleclaim very believable. So with that, I will stop this lynch.

I don't know, while it is very incriminating that Roy is a ghost and Wanderer is not, it's a bit strange that no-one has counter-claimed, and I think that the timeline might be a bit scrambled. In the OP, it says:

The Order of the
Stick, Hinjo, and the rest of the paladins must flee before
his forces.

Could this be during the invasion, before Roy died? I don't know. But it appears there is no going against the majority.

However, as I was typing, Bright said he's stopping the lynch. So, I guess we wait to see what's happening.

Roy died in the battle. By the time they were fleeing, he was already dead. And once again, Brighty demonstrates his bad judgment.

Roy died in the battle. By the time they were fleeing, he was already dead. And once again, Brighty demonstrates his bad judgment.

Wrong

And Wanderer, if I could suggest a target for tonight...
Kill: Maegereg

A) Brighty, say why you believe his role and why you are willing to stop his lynch
B) Don't just say wrong. State why your not demonstrating bad judgement, and why you think Roy will be in this mafia.
C) Why should Wanderer kill maegereg? No way will he kill him for no reason at all because a useless townie who isn't playing really poorly tells him to.

Seriously though Brighty if you don't stop becoming a nuisance to the town and basically trying to influence the game by seemingly purposely handicapping the town, tommorow I will kill you.

Wrong

No, right.

Roy falls from Kykons headless zombie dragon, after being struck by a meteor shower.
He then strikes the ground and dies, unable to contact Celia.
The plot unfolds from there leading on to the rest of the adventure.
Do not question me, I have AVIDLY read this comic.

Please Banned. Kill him.
It may prove Wanderers innocence, let alone save us the annoying comments.

Sp. Post 1:
Xykon*

A) Brighty, say why you believe his role and why you are willing to stop his lynch
B) Don't just say wrong. State why your not demonstrating bad judgement, and why you think Roy will be in this mafia.

Look at my roleclaim... What else!?

C) Why should Wanderer kill maegereg? No way will he kill him for no reason at all because a useless townie who isn't playing really poorly tells him to.

Unlike you, I'm active and have examined his behavior. This is between me and The Wanderer atm.

Seriously though Brighty if you don't stop becoming a nuisance to the town and basically trying to influence the game by seemingly purposely handicapping the town, tommorow I will kill you.

No. That would be a bad use of your power.
Even suggesting something like that...

Unlike you, I'm active and have examined his behavior. This is between me and The Wanderer atm.

Active doesn't always mean good. Also, it is not just between you and The Wanderer, this affects everyone as the killing of a single townie is bad for us all.

No. That would be a bad use of your power.
Even suggesting something like that...

That's ironic. You are going against the whole town in stopping a lynch and you are suggesting to The Wanderer to kill someone based on "behavior" without even hearing his rc.

Look at my roleclaim... What else!?

So this is where the "informed" part comes into play, eh? Unfortunately, you have already shown yourself to have bad judgment and simply saying, "look at my rc" doesn't cut it anymore. For all we know, you can simply be getting flavor text and misinterpreting it, you weren't so "informed" about whom to pressure now were you? Well, can anyone else who had this ability in a previous Rot game explain what it does exactly? Since Brighty is obviously post-restricted about explaining it.

Celia is also the one who would be the Lover with Roy...

That's ironic. You are going against the whole town in stopping a lynch and you are suggesting to The Wanderer to kill someone based on "behavior" without even hearing his rc.

I don't see it...

Active doesn't always mean good. Also, it is not just between you and The Wanderer, this affects everyone as the killing of a single townie is bad for us all.

But it means you are thinking.

So this is where the "informed" part comes into play, eh? Unfortunately, you have already shown yourself to have bad judgment and simply saying, "look at my rc" doesn't cut it anymore. For all we know, you can simply be getting flavor text and misinterpreting it, you weren't so "informed" about whom to pressure now were you? Well, can anyone else who had this ability in a previous Rot game explain what it does exactly? Since Brighty is obviously post-restricted about explaining it.

I fail to see my "bad judgement" and you and Maegereg seem to have the same trail of thought. Why are you attacking a townie player?
Especially when you yourself have not rc...